S. K. Mangar v. The State Of Bihar Through The Chief Secretary, Government Of Bihar, Patna
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2405 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-47 Year-2007 Thana- BELA District- Sitamarhi ====================================================== 1.
S. K. Mangar Late S. K. Habib R/O-Village - Chandi Rajwara P. S. - Bela, Dist. Sitamarhi 2.
Saidar Ali @ Mohammad Saidar Son of Azim R/O-Village - Chandi Rajwara P. S. - Bela, Dist. Sitamarhi ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna Bihar 2.
The State Sentence Remision Board, through the Pr. Secretary, Home Deptt., Govt. of Bihar, Patna Bihar 3.
The Joint Secretary-cum-Director(Administration), Home Deptt. (Prison), Bihar, Patna Bihar 4.
The Secretary, Law Department, Government of Bihar, Patna Bihar 5.
The Addl. Director General of Police, Criminal Investigation Deptt., Bihar, Patna Bihar 6.
The Inspector General, Jail and Reforms Service, Bihar, Patna Bihar 7.
The Assistant Inspector General, Jail and Reforms Services, Bihar, Patna Bihar 8.
The Jail Superintendent, Central Jail, Gaya Bihar ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Virendra Kumar For the Respondent/s :
Mr.A.G.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 17-06-2025 Heard the parties.
2. The present application has been for a direction upon the State Sentence Remission Board to consider the case of the petitioners for their premature release on the ground that they have already completed 16 years of custody.
3. At the outset, it has been submitted by the learned
Patna High Court CR. WJC No.2405 of 2024(2) dt.17-06-2025 2/2 counsel for the petitioners that the application for grant of remission has been rejected by the Authority.
4. The learned counsel for the State also submits that the application of the petitioners for grant of remission has been rejected by the competent authority.
5. In such circumstances, this application is disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to challenge the order by which their application for grant of remission has been rejected in accordance with law. They should file separate application. (Sandeep Kumar, J) anand/- U T