Devanand Kumar v. The State Of Bihar Through The Chief Secretary Government Of Bihar Patna Namely Sri Amrit Lal Meena
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.3932 of 2024 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.333 of 2020 ====================================================== Devanand Kumar son of Late Bishwanath Prasad, resident of Village and Post Office-Hsanpura, Police Station-M.H. Nagar Hasanpura, District-Siwan, presently posted as Assistant Teacher in Rajkiya Primary School, Parari, Block-Hasanpura, District-Siwan.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary Government of Bihar Patna namely Sri Amrit Lal Meena Patna.
2.
The Additional Chief Scretary, Department of Education, Government of Bihar, Patna namely Dr. S. Siddharth.
3.
The Director, Department of Primary Education, Government of Bihar, Patna, namely Sri Pankaj Kumar.
4.
The District Magistrate, Siwan, namely Sri Mukul Kumar Gupta. 5.
The District Education Officer, Siwan, namely Sri Raghvendra Pratap Singh. 6.
The District Programme Officer (Establishment), Siwan, namely Awadhesh Kumar.
7.
The Block Education Officer, Maharajganj Block, District-Siwan, namely Sri Raj Kishor Upadhyay.
... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Sanjay Kumar Singh, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Standing Counsel 16 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 05-05-2026 Heard the parties.
2. The present petition has been preferred for the following relief(s):
"for initiation of contempt proceeding against the contemnors/opposite parties for their willful disobedience of the order dated 08.07.2024 passed in CWJC No. 333 of 2020."
Patna High Court MJC No.3932 of 2024(3) dt.05-05-2026 2/2
3. Show cause has come on behalf of the opposite party and learned State Counsel has taken this Court to the order passed by the Director, Primary Education dated 12.06.2025 to show that the claim of the petitioner has been rejected.
4. Granting liberty to the petitioner to agitate the matter, if any grievance still remains, the present contempt petition stands disposed of.
(Rajiv Roy, J) Vijay Singh/- U