← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./28762/2018bail granted

Neyaz Ahmad @ Neyaz Ahmed v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-05-10Mr. Justice Sudhir Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.28762 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-137 Year-2017 Thana- MAJHAULIA District- West Champaran ====================================================== Neyaz Ahmad @ Neyaz Ahmed, S/o Master Amruddin, resident of MohallaHanuman Garhi, P.S.- Motihari Town, District- East Champaran. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. Seraj Alam, S/o Md. Habib,

3. Anjum Ara, W/o Neyaj Ahmad, D/o Md. Habib, Both resident of VillageJaukatiya, Churihar Tola, P.S.- Majhaulia, Dist.- West Champaran. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sanjeev Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Smt. Asha Devi ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 10-05-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 341, 323, 498A, 307 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and 3⁄4 of Dowry Prohibition Act. Allegation against the petitioner is of committing torture upon the victim due to non-fulfilment of demand of dowry.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.28762 of 2018(2) dt.10-05-2018 2/2 present case due to petty family dispute. There is no medical report to support the allegations for constituting offence under Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code. Rest of the offences are triable by the Magistrate. The petitioner has relied upon the judgment of this Court in the case of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari @ Naimul Haque Ansari & Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006(3) PLJR 182.

On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the Complaint Case/F.I.R. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bettiah, West Champaran in connection with Majhaulia P.S. Case No. 137/2017, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

(Sudhir Singh, J) Pankaj/- U T