Praveen Kumar @ Pravin Kumar v. The State Of Bihar Through Mr. Arvind Kumar Choudhary, Department Of Home,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.3943 of 2024 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.13895 of 2021 ====================================================== 1.

Praveen Kumar @ Pravin Kumar son of Ramashray Prasad @ Ramashry Prasad, Resident of village- Khudai Tola Beldari, PO- Hemara, PSKhizersarai, District- Gaya. 2.

Santosh Kumar, son of Hera Lal, Resident of village and PO- Doma @ Doman, PS- Salimpur (Bakhtiyarpur), District- Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through Mr. Arvind Kumar Choudhary, Department of Home, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2.

Mr. B. Rajendra, son of not known, the Principal Secretary, General Administration Department, Govt. of Bihar.

3.

Mr. Alok Raj, son of not known, the Director General of Police, Bihar, Patna.

4.

Mr. Jitendra Kumar Gangawar, son of not known, the Additional Director General of Police Head Quarter, Bihar, Patna. 5.

Md. Parwez Tauhib, son of not known, the Inspector General of Police, Rail, Bihar, Patna.

6.

Mr. Rakesh Rathi, son of not known, the Inspector General of Police, Patna Zone, Patna.

7.

Mr. Vivekanand, son of not known, the Inspector General of Police, Bhagalpur Zone, Bhagalpur.

8.

Mr. Shivdip Lande, son of not known, the Inspector General of Police, Tirhut Zone, Muzaffarpur.

9.

Mr. Babu Ram, son of not known, the Inspector General of Police, Darbhanga Zone, Darbhanga.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Rakesh Ranjan, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Md. Irshad, AC to SC-1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIBEK CHAUDHURI ORAL ORDER 10-10-2025 It appears from the show cause filed by the opposite parties, especially Annexure-B of the show cause that the judgment passed in C.W.J.C. No. 13895 of 2021, dated

Patna High Court MJC No.3943 of 2024(3) dt.10-10-2025 2/2 16.05.2024 has been complied with by giving the petitioners adhoc appointment.

2. In view of such appointment, nothing remains in the instant contempt application and the contempt application is disposed of on full satisfaction.

3. The learned Advocate for the petitioners is raising his objection with regard to regularization of the petitioners in service, the matter relates to a new cause of action for which the petitioner is required to take appropriate step in accordance with law.

(Bibek Chaudhuri, J.) Jyoti Kumari/- U