← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./80506/2023allowed

Deepnarayan Prasad @ Jaggu v. The State Of Bihar

2023-12-14Mr. Justice Sunil Kumar Panwar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.80506 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-2 Year-2020 Thana- LAHERIMUHALLA District- Nalanda ====================================================== DEEPNARAYAN PRASAD @ JAGGU SON OF LATE BINDESHWAR PRASAD RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- DULCHANDPUR, PS- RAHUI, DISTT- NALANDA ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Raj Kishor Prasad with Mr. Ashok Kumar, Advocates For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Binod Kumar No. 3, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 14-12-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 147, 148, 149, 307, 379 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

3. The allegation against the petitioner along with others is of firing upon the son of the informant, due to which he sustained injury.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case due to dirty village politics. He has committed no offence. There is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioner rather the specific allegation against co-accused Manish Kumar and

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.80506 of 2023(2) dt.14-12-2023 2/2 Chhotu @ Vivek, who shot fired upon the informant's son. There is no specific overt act against the petitioner of firing, he is only a member of mob. Petitioner has got no criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of the bail petition. He is languishing in judicial custody since 10.09.2023.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case as well as period of custody, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nalanda at Biharsharif in connection with Laheri P.S. Case No. 02 of 2020. (Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) Arish/- U T