Mukesh Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.38389 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -132 Year- 2018 Thana -MUNGER MUFFASIL District- MUNGER ======================================================

1. Mukesh Yadav, S/o Arjun Yadav, R/o Village- Pirparhar (Toufir), P.S.- Muffasil, Dist.- Munger.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Arvind Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri S.M. Rahman ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 02-07-2018 The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Muffasil P.S. Case No. 132 of 2018, registered for offences punishable under Sections 366, 376/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Allegation against the petitioner is of kidnapping the informant.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the statement of the girl recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C. itself shows that she wants to live with the petitioner and in this case also the informant herself has sworn the affidavit. Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides, considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bond of Rs. 25,000

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.38389 of 2018 (2) dt.02-07-2018 2/2 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned CJM, Munger in connection with Muffasil P.S. Case No. 132 of 2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C, it is further subject to the condition that:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the investigation and make himself available as and when required by the police and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the police on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail bonds.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T