Vikash Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.81467 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-141 Year-2024 Thana- GAIGHAT District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== Vikash Kumar S/o- Birendra Ram R/o- Mohammadpur Sura Naya Tola PsGaighat Dist- Muzaffarpur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Alok Kumar Alok For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Jai Narain Thakur ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 14-02-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Gaighat P.S. Case No. 141/2024, registered for the offence punishable under sections 147, 148, 307, 149, 302, 354, 341, 323 and 324 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per the prosecution case, petitioner along with other co-accused came to the house of the informant. Coaccused Devendra Ram hit Chandan Ram with Kudhri due to which his head got sustained inuries. Co-accused Dharmendra Ram and Virendra Ram had hit Sanjay Kumar, informant's husband. Co-accused Devendra Ram hit informant's husband with Kudhri on head due to which his head got injured. Dharmendra Ram had also hit Dhaneshwar Ram with a Kudhri

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.81467 of 2024(4) dt.14-02-2025 2/2 on his left shoulder and had also hit the informant's mother in law. Sanjay Kumar died due to the injuries sustained on head.

4. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the specific allegation of assault is against other accused persons. There is general and omnibus allegation against this petitioner. Petitioner claims clean antecedent. Charge sheet has already been filed. Petitioner is in custody since 03.06.2024.

5. Learned counsel for the State and the informant oppose the prayer for bail.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts of the case, prayer for regular bail of the petitioner is allowed. Let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class (East), Muzaffarpur in connection with Gaighat P.S. Case No. 141 of 2024.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Ranjeet/- U T