Mithun Singh @ Mithun Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.75731 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-156 Year-2025 Thana- ATHMALGOLA District- Patna ====================================================== Mithun Singh @ Mithun Kumar Son of Pravesh Singh R/o Village - Jamalpur Barahiya, P.S. - Athmalgola, P.S. - Athmalgola, Dist. - Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ashok Kumar Kashyap For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Md. Mushtaque Alam ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 17-12-2025 1.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109(1), 352, 351(2), 74, 303(2) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.

3.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that on 10-5-2025 at 2 PM, 8 named accused persons including the petitioner came near her house and started abusing, on objection by her son, Sudhir, the petitioner assaulted her son by rod causing injury on head, thereafter the petitioner assaulted Dhananjay by rod causing injury on head, on alarm people gathered and accused fled and while fleeing petitioner

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.75731 of 2025(2) dt.17-12-2025 2/3 snatched her chain and Pravesh threatened not to institute a case and injured were taken to hospital.

4.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant. It is next submitted that petitioner and the informant are neighbours and are having dispute relating to passage on account of which an altercation took place in which both sides assaulted each other. It is also submitted that even injury suffered by the injured has been opined to be simple in nature, as has been recorded in the case diary at para- 34 and 35. It is further submitted that petitioner is not a criminal. 5.

Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

6.

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Athmalgola P.S. Case No. 156 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.75731 of 2025(2) dt.17-12-2025 3/3 under Section 482 (2) of the BNSS.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Sumit/- U T