Shanny Kumar @ Sanni Kumar @ Sanni Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.87040 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-24 Year-2024 Thana- CHIRAIYA District- East Champaran ====================================================== Shanny Kumar @ Sanni Kumar @ Sanni Kumar Singh Son Of Satendra Singh Resident Of Village- Haraj, P.S.- Shikarganj, District- East Champaran, Motihari ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sharda Nand Mishra, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Narendra Kumar Singh, APP For the Informant :

Mr. Madhurendra Kumar, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 27-01-2025 Heard Mr. Sharda Nand Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Narendra Kumar Singh, learned A.P.P. for the State as well as Mr. Madhurendra Kumar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the informant.

2. The petitioner seeks bail, who is in custody since 20.01.2024, in connection with Chiraiya (Sikarganj) P.S. Case No. 24/2024, FIR dated 19.01.2024 registered for the offence under Sections 302 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per the prosecution case, petitioner has fired upon the brother of the informant due to which he received gunshot injury and during the treatment he died.

4. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and he has falsely been

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.87040 of 2024(3) dt.27-01-2025 2/2 implicated in this case. He further submits that due to admitted land dispute the present occurrence has taken place. He further submits that both the parties are agnates to each other. The petitioner is rotting in judicial custody since 20.01.2024.

5. Learned counsel for the informant as well as learned A.P.P. for the State, on the other hand, have vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner and submit that there is direct and specific allegation against the petitioner that he has fired upon the deceased.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts that there is direct and specific allegation against the petitioner that he has fired upon the deceased, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail in connection with Chiraiya (Sikarganj) P.S. Case No. 24/2024 pending in the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Motihari, East Champaran.

7. Prayer is refused.

(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) ajay/- U T