← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/17324/2023disposed

Ramadhar Pandit v. The State Of Bihar

2024-01-08Mr. Justice Purnendu Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17324 of 2023 ====================================================== Ramadhar Pandit Son of Vigo Pandit Resident of Mohalla-Mahuawa, P.O.- Damodarpur, P.S.-Pipra, District-East Champaran. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary, Panchayati Raj, Department, Bihar, Patna.

2.

The District Magistrate, East Champaran.

3.

The District Panchayati Raj Officer, East Champaran. 4.

The Sub Divisional Officer, Chakia.

5.

The Block Development Officer, Chakia.

6.

The Circle Officer, Chakia.

7.

The Block Panchayati Raj, Officer, Chakia.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Rishikesh Ojha, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Abbas Haider ( SC- 6 ) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER 08-01-2024 Heard Mr. Rishikesh Ojha, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Mr. Abbas Haider, learned SC-6 for the respondent/s.

2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has questioned the alleged illegal action of the Block Development Officer, Chakia, who had allegedly, has proceeded to relocate the site for constructing the Panchayat Sarkar Bhawan at village Korigawa in place of the headquarter village Mahuwawa. He submits that same is not in accordance with government's guidelines.

3. Considering the relief(s) sought for in the present

Patna High Court CWJC No.17324 of 2023(2) dt.08-01-2024 2/2 writ petition, the District Magistrate, East Champaran, is directed to call for the records from the Circle Officer, Chakia, as well as, from the Block Development Officer, Chakia and see that adequate government land is available at the headquarter village as claimed by the petitioner. Upon investigation he is satisfied that land is available then in that case he may take action against the Block Development Officer, who has impeaded the development work with respect to the construction of Panchayat Sarkar Bhawan at the headquarter village. In case, it is found that his action is malafide, he may recommend for appropriate disciplinary action against the Block Development Officer or any of the concerned officer of the Block.

4. The District Magistrate, East Champaran, must ensure to take appropriate steps to proceed with the development work of construction of the Panchayat Sarkar Bhawan at the appropriate site as determined by him expeditiously in accordance with the circular of the State Government.

5. Accordingly, the present writ petition is disposed of.

(Purnendu Singh, J) Niraj/- U