Ranjay Yadav @ Ranjit Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.77128 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-283 Year-2025 Thana- MANJHI District- Saran ====================================================== 1.
Ranjay Yadav @ Ranjit Yadav S/o Late Sipahi Rai @ Sipahi Yadav R/o Village - Mian Pattee, P.S - Manjhi, District - Saran at Chapra 2.
Vinay Yadav S/o Late Sipahi Rai @ Sipahi Yadav R/o Village - Mian Pattee, P.S - Manjhi, District - Saran at Chapra 3.
Rajesh Yadav S/o Late Sipahi Rai @ Sipahi Yadav R/o Village - Mian Pattee, P.S - Manjhi, District - Saran at Chapra ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Nawal Kishore Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Rajesh Kumar, A.P.P.
For the Informant :
Mr. Chandra Mohan Jha, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 11-12-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, informant and the State.
2. Petitioners apprehend arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 118(1), 109, 352, 303(2), 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.
3. As per prosecution case, on 19.07.2025 at about 5:30 PM, when informant was returning from school, on the way, these petitioners assaulted informant by means of iron rod, spade, dabia as a result of which, he sustained injuries. It is further alleged that the accused persons also snatched Rs. 25,000/- cash and gold chain.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.77128 of 2025(2) dt.11-12-2025 2/2
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are innocent and have committed no offence. On account of land dispute between the parties, altercation took place in which both sides sustained injuries. Case and counter case. Allegation of assault is general and omnibus. Rest of the allegations are ornamental only to make the case grave.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State vehemently opposed the bail application.
6. Considering the nature of accusation, case and counter case and other facts and circumstances of the case, this anticipatory bail is allowed and it is ordered that let the above named petitioners in the event of their arrest/surrender before the court below within a period of eight weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-IV, Saran at Chapra in connection with Manjhi P. S. Case No. 283 of 2025, subject to condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Navya/- U T