Patna High CourtCR. MISC./81573/2024bail granted

Sonu Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2024-12-03Mr. Justice R. P. Mishra3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.81573 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-150 Year-2024 Thana- BATHNAHA District- Sitamarhi ====================================================== Sonu Singh Son of Ram Naresh Singh @ Ram Naresh Kuvar Village-Latipur ps- Bathnaha District -Sitamarhi ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ravi Ranjan, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Nawal Kishore Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 03-12-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in Bathnaha P.S. Case No. 150 of 2024, instituted for the offences punishable under Section 393 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 25(1-B)(a), 26 and 35 of the Arms Act.

3. The prosecution case, in short, is that, the petitioner along with one co-accused person were trying to snatch something from a motorcycle rider. In the meantime, police party reached at the place of occurrence and apprehended the accused persons. On search, one country made pistol loaded with one cartridge along with one live cartridge have been recovered from the possession of the petitioner.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.81573 of 2024(2) dt.03-12-2024 2/3

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. Charge-sheet has been submitted in this case. No incriminating material has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the petitioner has got no concern with the alleged recovery of arms. The petitioner is in custody since 21.04.2024 and has got five criminal antecedents. There is no compliance of Section 100 of Cr.P.C.

5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and taking into account the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

7. Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Bathnaha P.S. Case No. 150 of 2024, subject to the following conditions: (I) One of the bailors shall be own/close member of the family of the petitioner.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.81573 of 2024(2) dt.03-12-2024 3/3 (II) The petitioner shall appear on each and every date fixed at the trial. In case of default in such appearance on two consecutive dates, the Trial Court will have liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Rajorshi/- U T