Patna High CourtCR. MISC./72225/2019allowed

Surendra Sahani v. The State Of Bihar

2020-02-06Mr. Justice Dr. Anil Kumar Upadhyay2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.72225 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-196 Year-2018 Thana- HARSIDHI District- East Champaran ====================================================== SURENDRA SAHANI Son of Rajaram Sahani Resident of Village-Uchaka Gawn, P.S-Govindganj, District-East Champaran. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Bimlesh Kumar Pandey For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Akhileshwar Dayal ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER 06-02-2020 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the counsel appearing on behalf of the State.

Petitioner is in custody in connection with N.D.P.S. P.S. Case No. 31 of 2018 arising out of Harsidhi P.S. Case No. 196 of 2018 for the offence under sections 20 and 22 of the N.D.P.S. Act.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that allegation against this petitioner is that he was involved in trade of ganja. In this case 51 kgs ganja was seized. Learned counsel submits that nothing was recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner is in custody since 16.11. 2018. Considering the period of custody, the Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner subject to the condition

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.72225 of 2019(3) dt.06-02-2020 2/2 that petitioner shall deposit Rs. 50,000/- cash and on deposit of Rs. 50,000/- cash, the court below shall release the petitioner, named above, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 50,000/- (Fifty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-1st cum Special Judge N.D.P.S., East Champaran at Motihar, in N.D.P.S. Case No. 31 of 2018, arising out of Harsiddhi P.S. Case No. 196 of 2018.

The court below is directed to expedite the trial and conclude the same at the earliest preferably within a period of four months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. In the event, the petitioner is found involved in delaying the trial, the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the petitioner. The deposit of Rs. 50,000/- shall abide by final outcome of the pending criminal case.

(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) Ravi/- U T