Hira Chaudhary v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.78973 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-303 Year-2019 Thana- GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL COMP. District- Nalanda ====================================================== Hira Chaudhary, Male, aged about 40 years, Son of Late Rajdeo Chaudhary Resident of Village - Sirsiya Bigha, P.S.- Noorsarai, District - Nalanda. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Satya Ranjan Sinha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Lakshmi Kant Sharma ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 11-12-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

In this case, the petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Excise Case No. 303C3 Ex/2019 registered for offences under sections 30(A) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

As per allegation, the police has recovered 14 liters of illegal liquor.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has criminal antecedent as earlier also small quantity of liquor was recovered from him.

Looking to the quantity of liquor recovered as also considering the entire facts and circumstances of the case, let

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.78973 of 2019(2) dt.11-12-2019 2/2 the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from today, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned 3rd Additional Sessions Judge, Nalanda at Biharsharif in connection with Excise Case No. 303C3 Ex/2019, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. as also subject to condition that whenever the police will call the petitioner for investigation/interrogation, he will remain present and if he would not present himself, the privilege of grant of anticipatory bail shall be deemed to have been canceled. It is also made clear that if the petitioner is repeats the similar offence in future, the prosecution will be at liberty to file an application for cancellation of the bail.

(Shivaji Pandey, J) rishi/- U T