Ranjeet Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.77401 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-52 Year-2025 Thana- CHIHARA District- Jamui ====================================================== Ranjeet Singh S/O Late Hari Singh R/O Village- Kanraidih, P.S- Chihra, Distt.- Jamui.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Lilawati Devi W/O-Raju Thakur, R/O-Village- Kankarbagh. P.S. Chihura , Dist.-Jamui ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Ms. Sanju Singh, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Raj Kishor Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 06-04-2026 Heard Mr. Sanju Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Raj Kishor Singh, learned APP for the State.

2. Petitioner seeks bail, who is in custody since 15.07.2025, in connection with Chihra P.S. Case No. 52 of 2025, F.I.R. dated 08.07.2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 64(1), 77, 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 4 of the POCSO Act and Section 67(b) of IT Act.

3. Allegation against the petitioner is that he along with other co-accused person have forcibly committed physical relation with the victim and its video was made and the video was made viral by the petitioner on social media.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.77401 of 2025(4) dt.06-04-2026 2/2 the petitioner has clean antecedent and he has been falsely implicated in the present case. She further submits that the allegation as alleged in the F.I.R. is false and fabricated and the petitioner has not committed any offence as alleged in the F.I.R.

5. Learned APP for the State, on the other hand, on the basis of material available on record and case diary, vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner and submits that it has come during investigation in paragraph-91 of the case diary, the CDR of the petitioner was examined which suggests that the petitioner has participated in the present crime in question and from his phone the video of the victim in question has been viralled by the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail in connection with Chihra P.S. Case No. 52 of 2025 pending in the Court of learned Exclusive Special Judge, POCSO, Jamui.

7. Prayer is refused.

(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) Ibrar//- U T