Md. Sonu v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.80846 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-129 Year-2025 Thana- GWALPARA District- Madhepura ====================================================== Md. Sonu S/o Md. Inus @ Inus Alam @ Meer Insul Resident of Village - Jot Manohar (Jhajhri), P.S - Gwalpara, District - Madhepura ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Ms. Patla Kumari, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Chandra Bhushan Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 01-12-2025

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State, Mr. Chandra Bhushan Prasad.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109(1), 352, 351(3) and 3(5) of the BNS, 2023.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that he was coming from coaching and some girl students were also going ahead of him when petitioner used inappropriate words with the girls, on which informant objected, when petitioner along with an unknown accused assaulted him causing injury on head, further they called 7-8 accused persons who also started fighting, but villagers gathered and pacified the fight and police brought him to the PHC.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant. It is next submitted that from perusal of the allegation

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.80846 of 2025(2) dt.01-12-2025 2/2 as alleged in the FIR, it would manifest that the same does not even remotely suggest that inappropriate words were used by the petitioner with the girl students, as it is alleged that girls asked the petitioner to give way on which he said that there is no space. It is also submitted that petitioner is not a criminal.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Gwalpara P.S. Case No. 129 of 2025 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of BNSS.

7. Accordingly, the instant anticipatory bail application is allowed.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Rishabh/- U T