Amar Ravidas @ Amar Das v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.76648 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-26 Year-2019 Thana- SABAUR District- Bhagalpur ====================================================== Amar Ravidas @ Amar Das, Son of Bhounu Ravidas @ Bhonu Das @ Bhauni Das @ Bhaua Ravidas, Resident of Mohamdabad, Harijan Tola, Police Station-Lodipur, District-Bhagalpur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Praveen Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Mukeshwar Dayal, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 11-12-2019 Petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Sabour (Goradih) P. S. Case No. 26 of 2019 registered for the offence punishable under Section 392 of IPC. As per F.I.R. some miscreants have snatched away 6070 thousand rupees as well as other articles from the informant. F.I.R. is against unknown, later on, it appears that one accused was arrested, who made the confessional statement in another case, on the basis of which, petitioner has been made accused in this case as well as in another case.

Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that except confessional statement, there is nothing against him. No recovery was made from his possession. He is in custody for seven months.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.76648 of 2019(2) dt.11-12-2019 2/2 Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides, in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M.-VII, Bhagalpur, in connection with Sabour (Goradih) P. S. Case No. 26 of 2019, subject to the condition that one of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) Sunil Shukla/- U T