Kishuni Mandal And ORS v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.42636 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -34 Year- 2018 Thana -NATHNAGAR District- BHAGALPUR ======================================================
1. Kishuni Mandal, Son of Sukhdeo Mandal,
2. Sumit Kumar @ Sumit Kumar Mandal, Son of Kishuni Mandal,
3. Mithun Mandal @ Mithun Kumar, Son of Kishuni Mandal,
4. Pinki Devi, Wife of Basudeo Mandal, All are resident of VillageRaghopur, P.S. Nathnagar, District- Bhagalpur. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar.
.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ranjan Kumar Jha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Nagendra Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 23-07-2018 The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Nathnagar P.S. Case No. 34 of 2018, registered for offences punishable under Sections 448, 341, 323, 307, 354(B), 379, 504, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Allegation against the petitioners is of assault to the informant and others and petitioner no. 3 tried to outrage the modesty of the informant.
It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioners that they have falsely been implicated in this case and there is case and counter case and although there is allegation of assault but the injuries caused to the injured was found to be simple in nature and allegation of outraging is false and concocted. Heard learned A.P.P. also.
Having heard both sides, in view of the above facts, let the petitioners above named, in the event of their arrest or
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.42636 of 2018 (2) dt.23-07-2018 2/2 surrender before the court below within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bond of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned ACJM -I, Bhagalpur, in connection with Nathnagar P.S. Case No. 34 of 2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C, as well as subject to the following conditions, it is further subject to the condition that:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioners shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.
(ii) The petitioners shall cooperate in the investigation and make themselves available as and when required by the police and on the event of failure on their part to appear before the police on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of their bail bonds.
(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T