← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./45750/2018bail granted

Sanjay Mahto @ Sanjay Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2018-08-07Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.45750 of 2018 ======================================================

1. SANJAY MAHTO @ SANJAY KUMAR Son of Ram Padarath Mahto, resident of Village- Mohanpur, Police Station Bakhri, District Begusarai. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Amrendra Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Arun Kumar Pandey ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 07-08-2018 Heard the parties.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Bakhri P.S.Case no.89/18 , registered for offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 379/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against the petitioner is of assault by Pagharia on head.

Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the injuries are simple in nature and there is land dispute between the parties.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest or surrender before the court below within a

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.45750 of 2018 (2) dt.07-08-2018 2/2 period of six weeks from the date of receipt of the order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned ACJM-V, Begusarai in connection with Bakhri P.S.Case No.89 of 2018, subject to condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. With following conditions :

(i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall co-operate in the investigation of the case and make himself available as and when required by the Police, otherwise, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail bond. With the aforesaid direction, this application is allowed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U T