Ranjan Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.45696 of 2018 ======================================================
1. Ranjan Yadav, Son of Suresh Yadav, Resident of Village- Kanhaiya Bigha, P.S.- Barabar Prayatak (Bishnuganj O.P.), District- Jehanabad. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar.
.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Binay Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Umeshnand Pandit, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 06-08-2018 Heard the parties. The petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in connection with Hulasganj P.S.Case No. 49 of 2018, registered for offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 307, 324 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code and 27 of the Arms Act.
As per F.I.R., allegation against the petitioner is of twenty to twenty five persons were illegally mining the sand and on protest made by the informant and his associate, an altercation took place between them and the petitioner started make firing with rifle, causing injury.
Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. and no specific allegation has been attributed against the petitioner and the
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.45696 of 2018 (2) dt.06-08-2018 2/2 similarly situated co-accused has been granted privilege of anticipatory bail vide order dated 20.07.2018 passed in Cr. Misc. No.43908 of 2018 Learned A.P.P. opposes the prayer for bail.
Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as discussed above, let the petitioner, above named on surrender or arrest within six weeks, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub Judge-IV, Jehanabad in connection with Hulashganj P.S. Case No. 49 of 2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of Cr.P.C. with condition that one of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) Sudha/- U T