Ranju Devi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.45989 of 2018 Arising out of P.S. Case No.-186 Year-2011 Thana- VAISHALI District- Vaishali ====================================================== Ranju Devi, W/o Jai Umesh Sahani, resident of Village- Kachhari Bazar Machhua Toli, P.S. Vaishali, Districtc- Vaishali. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sunil Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ahmad Ali, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 08-08-2018 Heard the parties.

The petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in connection with Vaishali P.S. Case No. 186 of 2011, registered for offences punishable under Sections 302 and 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

As per F.I.R., allegation against the petitioner, who happens to be Gotani of the deceased, causing death of deceased and disposed her dead body.

Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner is the named accused in the F.I.R along with six other accused persons but charge sheet has been submitted against three accused persons and father-in-law has been granted bail by the Hon'ble High Court in Criminal Misc. No.27985 of 2018. It is also submitted that the deceased died due to burn injury as her saree caught fire while preparing food.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.45989 of 2018(2) dt.08-08-2018 2/2 Learned A.P.P. opposes the prayer for bail.

Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as discussed above, let the petitioner, above named, on surrender or arrest within six weeks be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vaishali at Hajipur, in connection with Vaishali P.S. Case No. 186 of 2011, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of Cr.P.C. with condition that one of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sudha/-sunil U T