Pago Bind v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.81148 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-97 Year-2023 Thana- TETERHAT District- Lakhisarai ====================================================== 1.

PAGO BIND S/O BUDHAN BIND VILLAGE- GUNSAGAR, PS. TETARHAT, DIST. LAKHISARAI 2.

SANTOSH KUMAR S/O SITARAM BIND VILLAGE- GUNSAGAR, PS. TETARHAT, DIST. LAKHISARAI 3.

KANHAY BIND S/O BUDHAN BIND VILLAGE- GUNSAGAR, PS. TETARHAT, DIST. LAKHISARAI ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Narsingh Tanti, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Anand Kishore Choudhary, APP.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 20-12-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 324, 379, 307, 504, 506, 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. Allegedly, all the accused persons including the petitioners are said to have abused and assaulted the informant's side brutally with deadly weapons due to which they sustained several injuries.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that petitioners are quite innocent and have committed no offence. No such occurrence as alleged ever took place.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.81148 of 2023(2) dt.20-12-2023 2/2 Petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case due to ulterior motive. The allegation levelled against the petitioners is not specific rather general and omnibus in nature. There is case and counter case between the parties. Though two injured persons, namely, Asharfi Bind and Santu Bind have sustained grievous injuries, but these petitioners are not the author of the said injuries. Petitioners have no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-3 of this application.

5. Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for bail.

6. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, as there is no specific overt act against the petitioners, let the above named petitioners, be released on bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned lower Court where the case is pending/successor Court in connection with Tetarhat P.S. Case No. 97 of 2023, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) divyanshi/- U T