Patna High CourtCR. MISC./45528/2018bail granted

Sonelal Kumar @ Sonelal Ray @ Sonu Ray And ORS v. The State Of Bihar

2018-08-13Mr. Justice Sanjay Priya2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.45528 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-31 Year-2018 Thana- RAGHOPUR District- Vaishali ======================================================

1. Sonelal Kumar @ Sonelal Ray @ Sonu Ray, Son of Surendra Ray.

2. Renu Devi, W/o Surendra Ray.

3. Surendra Ray S/o Late Jatan Ray, All R/o Village- Saraipur, P.S.- Ganga Bridge, District- Vaishali.

4. Shankar Ray @ Sankar Ray, S/o Kapil Ray, R/o VillageRustampur, P.S.- Raghopur, District- Vaishali. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Rina Sinha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Dr. Kumar Uday Pratap ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 13-08-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

Petitioners apprehend their arrest in Raghopur (Rustampur O.P.) P.S. Case No. 31 of 2018 instituted for the offence under Section(s) 363 and 366(A) of the Indian Penal Code.

Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that in the written report the informant has raised suspicion against co- accused Raushan Kumar of kidnapping his daughter. These petitioners are said to be family members of aforesaid Raushan Kumar.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.45528 of 2018(2) dt.13-08-2018 2/2 In the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer of the petitioners for grant of anticipatory bail is allowed. In the event of surrender/arrest of the petitioners, named above, within six weeks from today in connection with Raghopur (Rustampur O.P.) P.S. Case No. 31 of 2018, they shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the A.C.J.M-IV, Vaishali at Hajipur, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr. P.C. with further conditions:(1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioners shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will automatically cancel bail bond of the petitioners and

(3) if petitioners tamper with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioners.

(Sanjay Priya, J) shyambihari/- U T