Sudhir Yadav And ORS v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.48494 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -55 Year- 2017 Thana -SIGORI District- PATNA ======================================================

1. Sudhir Yadav, S/o Kisundev Yadav,

2. Buchan Yadav S/o Late Dipa Yadav,

3. Pintu Yadav S/o Nathun Yadav, All R/o Vill.- Davariya, P.S.- Sigori, District- Patna.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Parashuram Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ashok Kumar, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 24-08-2018 . Heard the parties. The petitioners seek anticipatory bail in connection with Sigori P.S. Case No. 55 of 2017, registered for offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 338, 353 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code.

As per F.I.R., allegation against the petitioners and others is of assault and pelting stones to the police personnel at the time of official discharge of duty by the informant and others. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case and allegation is general and omnibus against the petitioners. It is further submitted that the petitioners have no criminal

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.48494 of 2018 (2) dt.24-08-2018 2/2 antecedents.

Learned A.P.P. opposes the prayer for bail.

Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as discussed above, let the petitioners, above named on surrender or arrest within six weeks be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Twenty five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate- V, Danapur in connection with Sigori P.S.Case No. 55 of 2017, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of Cr.P.C. with condition that one of the bailors of the petitioners shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) Sudha U T