Niraj Yadav @ Niraj Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.75828 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-388 Year-2025 Thana- GOPALGANJ TOWN DistrictGopalganj ====================================================== Niraj Yadav @ Niraj Kumar S/o- Subash Manjhi @ Subhash Manjhi @ Subas Manjhi R/v- Kalisthan Sreya, Ward No- 13 PS- Gopalganj District- Gopaganj ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Indrajeet Bhushan, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Jharkhandi Upadhyay ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 24-02-2026 Heard Mr. Indrajeet Bhushan, learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State as also Mr. Thakur Brajesh Singh for the informant.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Gopalganj P.S. Case No. 388 of 2025 for the offence registered under sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109 and 3(5) of BNS.

3. As per the prosecution story, the informant alleged that his son was going to play cricket match, the named accused brutally assaulted by knife causing injury and he was shifted to Gorakhpur Hospital in which he got admitted to ICU. This led to the FIR.

4. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that though the injuries have been found to be grievous in nature, the order sheet of the learned Sessions Judge shows that on 22.08.2025, it was recorded that he was still in hospital whereas he is named accused in

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.75828 of 2025(3) dt.24-02-2026 2/2 a case under Gopalganj Town P.S. Case No. 604 of 2025 on 13.08.2025.

5. Learned APP for the State as also learned counsel for the informant, on the other hand, opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail submitting that the brutal assault is reflected from the injuries and multiple injuries have been found to be grievous in nature. The submission is that a discrepancy in the order-sheet cannot come in the way of the gravity of the case.

6. Considering the submissions of the parties as also the nature of injury that has come against the petitioner, no relief can be extended.

7. The anticipatory bail application of the petitioner stands rejected.

8. However, if the petitioner surrenders within four weeks from today, the Court concerned shall take up the matter and dispose it of preferably on the same day.

(Rajiv Roy, J) Vijay Singh/- U T