Raj Narayan Kumar Pandey @ Raj Narayan Pandey v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.45969 of 2018 Arising out of P.S. Case No.-59 Year-2018 Thana- GARDANIBAGH District- Patna ====================================================== Raj Narayan Kumar Pandey @ Raj Narayan Pandey, Son of Sri Kameshwar Pandey @ Manoj Pandey, resident of Village- Ghora Sahan, P.S.- Harpur, District- East Champaran at Motihari.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Vinod Gautam, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Parmeshwar Mehta, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 08-08-2018 Heard the parties.

The petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in connection with Gardanibagh P.S. Case No. 59 of 2018, registered for offences punishable under Sections 417 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code.

As per F.I.R., allegation against the petitioner is that he has demanded rupees three lacs from the informant for a job of Constable.

Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner has not been arrested on the spot and no recovery has been effected from the petitioner and he was named by the co-accused he has no criminal antecedent. Learned A.P.P. opposes the prayer for bail.

Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.45969 of 2018(2) dt.08-08-2018 2/2 circumstances, as discussed above, let the petitioner, above named, on surrender or arrest within six weeks be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna and Sub Judge XIV, in connection with Gardanibagh P.S. Case No. 59 of 2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of Cr.P.C. with condition that one of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sudha/-sunil U T