Rahul Kumar @ Rahul Yadav And ANR v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.49551 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-32 Year-2018 Thana- UCHKAGAON District- Gopalganj ======================================================
1. Rahul Kumar @ Rahul Yadav,
2. Lalu Yadav, Both S/o Manshi Chaudhary, R/o Village- Shyampur, P.S.- Uchakagaon, District- Gopalganj.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar.
... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Harsh Singh For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Sri Binod Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER 24-09-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.
The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 366(A)/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
Though allegation is of kidnapping of the daughter of the informant, the victim girl filed a copy of petition at Annexure 3 before the court below stating therein that she had love affairs with petitioner No.1, Rahul Kumar @ Rahul Yadav and she has already married with Rahul Kumar @ Rahul Yadav. Therefore, the said facts have been revealed in the impugned order also.
Considering the aforesaid material, let the
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.49551 of 2018(2) dt.24-09-2018 2/2 petitioners, above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of thirty days from the date of receipt of the order be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned court below where the case is pending in connection with Uchakagaon Police Station Case No.32 of 2018, subject to conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure as well as condition that the petitioners shall fully co-operate with the investigation/trial of the case, failing which the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioners.
(Birendra Kumar, J) abhishek/- U T