Kamleshwar Prasad Srivastava v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.51020 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -202 Year- 2018 Thana -BAGHA DistrictWESTCHAMPARAN(BETTIAH) ======================================================

1. Kamleshwar Prasad Srivastava Son of late Mahadeva Prasad Srivastava Resident of Village- Narwal-Borwal, P.S. Bagaha, District- West Champaran, Bihar.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Suresh Prasad Sharma, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Amit Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 04-09-2018 The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Bagaha (Patkhauli) P.S. Case No. 202/2018, registered for offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 420, 467, 468, 471, 379, 386, 504, 509, 120(B)/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Allegation against the petitioner and other accused persons is of executing false sale-deed.

Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that he is only a deed writer and has falsely been implicated in this case. Further submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent. Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides, considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner above named, in the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.51020 of 2018 (2) dt.04-09-2018 2/2 event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bond of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M., Bagaha, West Champaran, in connection with Bagaha (Patkhauli) P.S. Case No. 202/2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C, it is further subject to the condition that:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the investigation and make himself available as and when required by the police and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the police on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail bonds.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/Amjad/- U T