Patna High CourtCR. MISC./18949/2018dismissed

Diwakar Dubey And ORS v. The State Of Bihar

2018-09-07Mr. Justice Rajeev Ranjan Prasad2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.18949 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-132 Year-2012 Thana- SUGAULI District- East Champaran ======================================================

1. Diwakar Dubey, Son of Ramadhar Dubey,

2. Nitesh Dubey, Son of Diwakar Dubey,

3. Rajesh Dubey, Son of Likham Dubey,

4. Pappu Dubey, Son of Sachidanand Dubey,

5. Anil Dubey, Son of Late Ram Sakal Dubey, All are resident of Village- Belwatiya, P.S.- Sugauli, District- East Champaran.

6. Dayanand Dubey, Son of Late Deo Pujan Dubey, All are resident of Village- Belwatiya, P.S.- Sugauli, District- East Champaran.

7. Ravindra Sahani, Son of Late Baldeo Sahani, Resident of Village- Lal Parsa Tola- Barharwa, P.S.- Sugauli, District- East Champaran.

8. Pappu Dubey, Son of Kripanand Dubey, Resident of VillageBelwatiya, P.S.- Sugauli, District- East Champaran.

9. Gulchan Sahani, Son of Late Gorakh Sahani, Resident of Village- Barharwa, P.S.- Sugauli, District- East Champaran. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Vijay Shankar Shrivastava For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Sri Satya Nand Shukla ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER 07-09-2018 It appears that the present petitioners are aggrieved by the order dated 03.08.2017 passed by the learned Trial Court in exercise of his power under Section 319 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

On perusal of the order passed by the learned court below, this Court finds that it is a well reasoned order, the court has discussed the materials available on the record for purpose of prima facie satisfaction that the summons are required to be

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.18949 of 2018(2) dt.07-09-2018 2/2 issued to the petitioners in terms of Section 319 of the Cr.P.C. No interference is called for at this stage.

This application has no merit. It is, accordingly, dismissed.

(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) avin/- U T