Dikesh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.83430 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-112 Year-2022 Thana- AWTARNAGAR District- Saran ====================================================== Dikesh Kumar Son of Harendra Ray @ Harendra Prasad Resident Of VillageFatehpur Chain, P.S.- Awtarnagar, District- Saran (Chapra) ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Dhananjay Kumar Shahi, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tiwary, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 03-04-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.

2. Petitioner apprehends arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 341, 323, 324, 379, 307, 302 and 120(b) of the Indian Penal Code.

3. According to F.I.R., on the alleged date and time of occurrence, while informant was sitting with her husband in the house, all the F.I.R. named accused persons including this petitioner reached there, variously armed, and started abusing her husband. On protest, the accused persons assaulted informant and her family members and during course of treatment, husband of the informant died. It is further alleged that co-accused Ranjit Ray snatched gold chain of the informant's husband.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.83430 of 2024(2) dt.03-04-2025 2/2 petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case with general and omnibus allegation. It is further submitted that similarly situated co-accused, namely, Harendra Ray, having similar allegation, has already been granted anticipatory bail by coordinate Bench of this Hon'ble Court vide order dated 27.06.2023 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 21199 of 2023. Petitioner claims clean antecedent.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State vehemently opposed the bail application.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, this anticipatory bail is allowed and it is ordered that let the above named petitioner in the event of his arrest/surrender before the court below within a period of eight weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Saran at Chapra in connection with Awtarnagar P. S. Case No. 112 of 2022, subject to condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Navya/- U T