Mantun Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17192 of 2023 ====================================================== 1.
Mantun Kumar Son Of Late Brahmdeo Thakur, Resident Of Ward No. 41, Bari Eghu P.S. Mufsil Begusarai District Begusarai, Posted At Present M.S. Kothiya, Block-Begusarai, District-Begusarai. 2.
Balram Prasad Roy, Son Of Late Hareram Ray, Resident Of Village Jaimra Ward No. 10 Bihat Nagar Parishad, P.S. Barauni, District-Begusarai, Posted At Assistant Teacher Utkramit Middle School Bihat Ward No. 3 Block Barauni, District Begusarai.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Education, Government of Bihar, Patna.
2.
The Principal Secretary, Department of Education, Government of Bihar, Patna.
3.
The Principal Secretary, Department of Finance, Government of Bihar, Patna.
4.
The Director, Primary Education, Government of Bihar, Patna. 5.
The Regional Deputy Director of Education, Munger. 6.
The District Education Officer, Begusarai.
7.
The District Program Officer (Establishment), Begusarai. 8.
The District Account Officer, Begusarai.
... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Arabind Nath Pandey, Adv.
For the State :
Mr. Madhaw Prasad Yadaw, GP-23 Mr. Arvind Kumar, AC to GP-23 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 03-01-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the present case is squarely covered by by a Full Bench judgment of this Court passed in C.W.J.C. No. 11255 of 2016 (Rama Shankar Patel & Ors. vs. The State of Bihar and Ors.).
Patna High Court CWJC No.17192 of 2023(2) dt.03-01-2025 2/2
3. The petitioner is directed to file a detailed representation before the respondents no. 5 along with order passed C.W.J.C. No. 11255 of 2016 within a period of three weeks and the respondent no. 5 is well advised to consider the case of the petitioners after affording opportunity of personal hearing or through their counsel and pass a reasoned and speaking order in accordance with law within eight weeks thereafter.
4. It is made clear that the respondent no. 5 shall be liable for non-compliance of this order within the stipulated period.
5. If, it is found that the petitioners are entitled for the consequential benefits, the respondents shall pay all the consequential benefits to the petitioners within a period of eight weeks thereafter.
6. With the aforesaid direction, the writ application stands disposed of.
(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) devendra/- U