Md. Sakil @ Md. Sakeel v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.74047 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-646 Year-2019 Thana- KANTI THARMAL POWER DistrictMuzaffarpur ====================================================== MD. SAKIL @ MD. SAKEEL, Son of Md. Akhtar @ Md. Akhtar Qureshi @ Akhtar Hasnain, Resident of Village - Bishundatpur Barheta, P.S.- Mahindwara (Runni Saidpur), District - Sitamarhi. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Rakesh Kumar Soni For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Chandra Bhushan Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 11-12-2019 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 411, 412, 413/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation is that four miscreants were riding on two motorcycles and they were intercepted by the police and three miscreants were apprehended, however, one managed to flee away and from possession of the petitioner, one knife and stolen motorcycle recovered.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the recovered motorcycle belongs to the petitioner and he is registered owner of said motorcycle. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent and he is in custody since 28.08.2019.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.74047 of 2019(2) dt.11-12-2019 2/2 Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned court below where the case is pending in connection with Kanti P.S. Case No.646/19, with following conditions:- (1)Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the court below.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(S. Kumar, J) Sanjay/- U T