Md. Tuna @ Sadre Alam v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.79599 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-101 Year-2025 Thana- Singhaul District- Begusarai ====================================================== Md. Tuna @ Sadre Alam S/o Late Almun@ Aliudin R/o Dumri Masjid Tola, Ward No. 7, P.S- Singhoul, Dist- Begusarai ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Tanweer Kamal, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Lalan Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. SONI SHRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 19-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 127(3), 109(1), 115(2), 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the B.N.S.

3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner along with the co-accused is alleged to have thrown the informant's son from the terrace into the jungle situated behind the house, with the intention to kill him.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case along with co-accused Mr. Arse Alam and the said coaccused Mr. Arse Alam, after investigation has been held to be innocent and a final report was filed in his favour. As a matter of fact, it is only after informant's son was recovered in an unconscious condition in the Jungle that the present story had

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.79599 of 2025(5) dt.19-02-2026 2/2 been concocted and the petitioner was made an accused along with co-accused. It has further been submitted that as a matter of fact, there is no eye-witness to the occurrence even during the course of investigation and the petitioner is in custody since 08.07.2025 with no criminal antecedent and charge-sheet has been submitted.

5. Learned APP for the State opposed the grant of bail on the ground of allegations made in the First Information Report and materials collected during the course of investigation.

6. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances and also considering the fact that the informant himself has given an eye-witness account in the First Information Report of the petitioner of having thrown the deceased down from the terrace whereafter several villagers had also assembled, this Court is not inclined to grant the privilege of bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is hereby rejected in connection with Singhauli P.S. Case No.101 of 2025.

(Soni Shrivastava, J) anand/- U T