Ravi Giri @ Ravi Prakash Giri v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.77997 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-124 Year-2025 Thana- BAHERI District- Darbhanga ====================================================== Ravi Giri @ Ravi Prakash Giri Son of Sri Arun Giri Resident of village - Korigama, P.S.- Baheri, District - Darbhanga ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Swatantra Saurabh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Shahabuddin Azeem @ S. Azeem, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 06-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Baheri P.S. Case No. 124 of 2025 instituted for the offence under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109(1), 76, 303(2), 351(2) & 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. Earlier vide order dated 29-07-2025, passed in Cr. Misc. No. 46455 of 2025, regular bail of the petitioner was rejected by this Court, taking into account the specific allegation against the petitioner. 3.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the present one is the second attempt for grant of regular bail to the petitioner. It is mainly submitted that there is no significant progress in the trial. It has been submitted on behalf of the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.77997 of 2025(3) dt.06-02-2026 2/3 petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 21-04-2025, having no criminal antecedent. Learned counsel further submits that there is no likelihood of the trial being concluded in the near future. Learned counsel goes on to submit that the continued incarceration of the petitioner without conclusion of trial amounts to a gross violation of the fundamental right guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution of India, which is reiterated by Hon'ble Apex Court in plethora of judgments. 4.

Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner. 5.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, period of custody of the petitioner and taking into account the fact that continued detention of the petitioner would serve no purpose other than punitive pretrial incarceration, which is antithetical to the spirit of Article 21 of the Constitution of India, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

6.

Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 15,000/- (Fifteen Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Baheri P.S. Case No. 124 of 2025, subject to the following conditions:

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.77997 of 2025(3) dt.06-02-2026 3/3 (I) One of the bailors shall be own/close member of the family of the petitioner.

(II) The petitioner shall appear on each and every date fixed at the trial. In case of default in such appearance on two consecutive dates, the Trial Court will have liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Raj Kishore/- U T