Rijwan Sah v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.72771 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-386 Year-2017 Thana- RANIGANJ District- Araria ====================================================== Rijwan Sah, S/o Khudi Sah, Resident of Village- Jagta Kharsahi, P.S.- Raniganj, District- Araria.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Anil Prasad Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Sri Surendra Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 21-12-2018 The petitioner seeks bail in anticipation of his arrest in connection with Raniganj P.S. Case No. 386 of 2017 instituted for the offences under Sections 147, 148, 341, 342, 353, 504 of the Indian Penal Code.

The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that there is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioner in the written report. From the written report, it appears that although petitioner is named in the F.I.R, but there is no specific allegation against him.

Regard being had to the aforesaid facts, the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.72771 of 2018(2) dt.21-12-2018 2/2 surrender before the learned Court below within a period of four weeks from today, is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousands) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Araria in connection with Raniganj P.S. Case No. 386 of 2017, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C with further conditions (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and his absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will be liable to cancel his bail bonds and (3) if petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner. (Ashutosh Kumar, J) Shageer/- U T