Patna High CourtCR. MISC./74328/2018disposed

Sanjeev Kumar Pandit v. The State Of Bihar

2019-06-27Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.74328 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-23 Year-2018 Thana- MAHILA P.S District- Supaul ====================================================== Sanjeev Kumar Pandit, Son of Sahdeo Pandit, Resident of Village- Bela Singar Moti, Laxminiya Tola, Ward No.4, Hariyahi, P.S.-Nirmali,DistrictSupaul. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Pramod Mishra For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Sri Upendra Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 27-06-2019 This is an application for grant of anticipatory bail in connection with Supaul Mahila P.S. Case No.23 of 2018 disclosing offences under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3⁄4 of Dowry Prohibition Act. Allegation against the petitioner is for demand of Rs.1,00,000/- and a motorcycle, due to non-fulfillment, she was tortured physically and mentally and also assaulted due to which, she has received injury and she was admitted in Indira Gandhi Insitute, Sheikhpura, Patna and she is still walking on 'Vaishakhi'.

Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that he is still ready to keep her with dignity and care and he will not assault her in future.

Heard learned A.P.P. as well as learned counsel for the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.74328 of 2018(3) dt.27-06-2019 2/2 opposite party no.2 also, who has opposed the prayer for bail. Having heard both sides, in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. However, despite the fact that by considering the prayer for regular bail, if the court concerned will see that there is a chance of amicable settlement between the parties.

With the aforesaid observations, this application is disposed of.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) Sunil Shukla/- U T