← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./78710/2018dismissed

Rohit Lal Dev v. The State Of Bihar

2019-01-10Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.78710 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-430 Year-2018 Thana- BAHADURPUR District- Darbhanga ====================================================== Rohit Lal Dev S/o Rabindra Lal Dev, resident of village-Bivani, O.P.-Pataur, P.S. -Bahadurpur, District-Darbhanga.

... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Pankaj Kumar Das For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr Anil Kumar Singh 1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 10-01-2019 Petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with G.O. Case No. 866 of 2018, arising out of Bahadurpur P.S. Case No. 430 of 2018 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 30(a), 32(2)(3) and 38 of Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

Allegation is of recovery of huge quantity of liquor from the hut of one Ajay Yadav and police arrested some persons, who have disclosed the name of the petitioner stating that the liquor was supplied by the petitioner. It further appears that petitioner is accused in three other cases of similar type. Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that nothing has been recovered from his conscious possession and he has falsely been implicated in this case. Heard learned APP also, who has opposed the prayer

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.78710 of 2018(2) dt.10-01-2019 2/2 for anticipatory bail of the petitioner stating that huge quantity of liquor was recovered.

Having heard both sides and in view of allegation and criminal antecedents of the petitioner, I am not inclined to grant privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Petitioner to surrender and make prayer for regular bail, which shall be considered on its own merit, without being prejudiced by this order.

With the above observation, this application is dismissed.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) spal/- U T