Md. Shamsul Hoda @ Samsul Hoda Mansuri @ Samsul Hoda (Dak Karmi) v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.83247 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-298 Year-2022 Thana- PARIHAR District- Sitamarhi ====================================================== MD. SHAMSUL HODA @ SAMSUL HODA MANSURI @ SAMSUL HODA (DAK KARMI) SON OF ABDUL HAKIM MANSURI @ ABDUL HAQUIM NADAF R/O VILLAGE- PARIHAR TOLE JHAPAHA, P.S.- PARIHAR, DISTRICT- SITAMARHI ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Uday Kumar, Adv.

For the State :

Mr.Ram Sevak Choudhary, APP For the Informant :

Mr.Ram Niwas Ray, Adv.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 10-05-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the informant and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with a case registered for the offence punishable u/s 341, 323, 406, 420, 504, 506, 409, 34 of the IPC.

3.

As per the prosecution case, the petitioner along with other accused is said to have committed forgery of Rs.7,00,000/- with the informant by abusing their post.

4.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and has not committed any offence as alleged in the FIR. He has been falsely implicated in this case due to ulterior motive. There is general and omnibus allegation

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.83247 of 2023(5) dt.10-05-2024 2/2 against the petitioner. Some of the co-accused has been granted anticipatory bail by this Court on the condition that they were ready to deposit Rs.1,50,000/- each in the account of informant. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is already languishing in custody since 07.06.2023 i.e. for more than ten months and has three criminal antecedent. 5.

Learned APP for the State as well as learned counsel for the informant opposed the prayer for bail.

6.

Considering the facts and circumstances of this case, the above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/the Successor Court, in connection with Parihar P.S. Case No.298/2022, subject to the condition that he will appear before the trial Court on each and every date fixed by the Court and if he fails to appear on two consecutive dates, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below itself. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) pallavi/- U T