Patna High CourtCR. MISC./78524/2025dismissed

Raja Singh @ Babu Saheb @ Rahul Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2026-02-11Mr. Justice Sandeep Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.78524 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-61 Year-2021 Thana- MADHUBAN District- East Champaran ====================================================== Raja Singh @ Babu Saheb @ Rahul Kumar Son of Late Bhola Singh @ Ganesh Prasad Singh Resident of Village - Mahrauli, P.S.- Aurai, District - Muzaffarpur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Kush, Advocate For the State :

Mr.Nand Kishore Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 11-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. This is the second attempt on behalf of the petitioner for grant of bail in connection with Madhuban P.S. Case No. 61 of 2021 registered for the offence under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. Earlier the bail application of the petitioner has been rejected vide order dated 22.01.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 74850 of 2024, which reads as under:

"Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Madhuban P.S. Case No. 61 of 2021 registered for the offence under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per the prosecution case, unknown criminals have looted Rs. 10.95 lakhs

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.78524 of 2025(3) dt.11-02-2026 2/2 from the informant who belongs to Bharat Finance.

3. The name of the petitioner has come in the self-inculpatory statement of the co-accused Sachin Kr. Singh.

4. It has been argued by the learned counsel for the petitioner that there is no recovery from the petitioner and Sachin Kr.

Singh has already been granted bail by this Court The petitioner is in custody since 8.7.2024.

5. Considering the fact that the petitioner is one of the criminals who participated in the loot of huge amount and has six criminal antecedents, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

6. Accordingly, this application is dismissed."

4. From the report of the trial Judge, it appears that the case has been committed to the Court of Sessions.

5. Considering the gravity of the offence and also the fact that the case has been committed to the Court of Sessions, I am not inclined to review my earlier order.

6. Accordingly, the application stands dismissed. (Sandeep Kumar, J) P. Kumar U T