← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./81090/2023allowed

Md. Anjar @ Anjar @ Md. Anjar Alam v. The State Of Bihar

2023-12-15Mr. Justice Sunil Kumar Panwar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.81090 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-178 Year-2023 Thana- RAGHOPUR District- Supaul ====================================================== MD. ANJAR @ ANJAR @ MD. ANJAR ALAM Son of Late Md. Ramjan Ali R/o vill - Phulkaha, P.S. - Jadiya, Distt. - Supaul ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Vijay Kishore Bharti For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Anant Kumar 1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 15-12-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case instituted for the offence under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per prosecution case, some unknown miscreants came on motorcycles stopped the informant's pick-up and on the point of pistol snatched cash, documents, mobile and other articles.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. He has committed no offence. Petitioner is not named in the FIR and the same has been lodged against unknown persons. The name of the petitioner has come into light, on the basis of confessional

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.81090 of 2023(2) dt.15-12-2023 2/2 statement of co-accused persons. He submitted that so far as blue bag is concerned, it is a common bag and easily available in the market and cash of Rs. 12,000/- belongs to the petitioner which was kept to send to his son, who is preparing for entrance examination of M.B.B.S. in Delhi and both things were recovered after about two months of the occurrence. No T.I. Parade has been done. On the basis of suspicion, petitioner has been implicated in the present case. He is languishing in judicial custody since 29.06.2023.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case as well as period of custody, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.C.J.M., Birpur, Supaul in connection with Raghopur P.S. Case No. 178 of 2023. (Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) Arish/- U T