Rahul Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.70329 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-92 Year-2019 Thana- KIUL District- Lakhisarai ====================================================== RAHUL KUMAR Son of Sanjay Yadav Resident of Village - Akauna, P.S.- Sirari, District - Sheikhpura, At present Residing at His maternal uncle 039s Village - Singarpur, P.S.- Kiul, District - Lakhisarai. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sanjeev Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Shaheen Begum ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 04-12-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

Petitioner, who is in custody, seeks bail in connection with Kiul P.S. Case No. 92 of 2019 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 272, 273 of the Indian Penal Code. Allegation is recovery of 50 litres of country made liquor from the bag of the petitioner.

It has been submitted on behalf of petitioner that he is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. Nothing was recovered from the conscious possession of petitioner. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent and is in custody since 10.09.2019.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.70329 of 2019(2) dt.04-12-2019 2/2 the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- (twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned court below, in connection with Kiul P.S. Case No. 92 of 2019 subject to the conditions that:-

(1) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be represented on each and every date fixed by the court.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(4) If the petitioner is found involved in similar nature of offences, after his release on bail the trial court shall take steps to cancel his bail bond.

(S. Kumar, J) veena/- U T