Mungia Devi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.83181 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-96 Year-2024 Thana- DANDARI District- Begusarai ====================================================== 1.

Mungia Devi, Wife of Bhola yadav, Resident of village- Tetri, P.S.- Muffasil, District- Begusarai 2.

Gana Devi, Wife of Sanjay Yadav, Resident of village- Tetri, P.S.- Muffasil, District- Begusarai 3.

Rubi Devi, Wife of Shambhu Yadav, Resident of village- Tetri, P.S.- Muffasil, District- Begusarai ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Braj Bhusan Poddar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Nirmal Kumar Sinha, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 12-12-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. Nirmal Kumar Sinha, learned APP for the State. 2.The instant application for anticipatory bail has been filed by the petitioners apprehending their arrest in connection with Dandari P.S. Case No. 96 of 2024 instituted for the offence under Sections 127(2), 115(2), 303(2), 74, 329(4), 118(1), 109, 352, 3(5) of B.N.S. Act.

3. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioners were abusing the informant without any reason. When it was objected by the mother of the informant, the petitioners along with others assaulted the informant, his wife and his mother.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.83181 of 2024(2) dt.12-12-2024 2/2 petitioners has submitted that petitioners are innocent and have committed no offence. They have falsely been implicated in this case. There is specific allegation against co-accused Sanjay Yadav. From perusal of the F.I.R., it is clear that the specific allegation against these petitioners is abusing. Nature of allegation of assault against these petitioners is general and omnibus. Petitioners are ladies and they are having no criminal antecedent.

5. In contra, learned APP appearing for the State has opposed the prayer of bail of the petitioners.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and in the facts and circumstances of the case as stated above, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail. The petitioners are directed to surrender in the Court below within a period of four weeks from today and in the event of their arrest or surrender in connection with Dandari P.S. Case No. 96 of 2024, they will be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned J.M. 1st Class, Begusarai, subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) lata/- U T