Patna High CourtCR. MISC./76492/2025bail granted

Ramesh Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2026-02-23Mr. Justice Jitendra Kumar3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.76492 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-101 Year-2025 Thana- NARPATGANJ District- Araria ====================================================== Ramesh Yadav, Son of Sri Haldhar Yadav, R/o Village- Simarahi Mirdaul, Ward No. 12, P.S.- Narpatganj, District- Araria. ... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Mritunjay Kumar, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Anuj Kumar Shrivastava, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER 23-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail, apprehending his arrest, in connection with Narpatganj P.S. Case No.101 of 2025, dated 23.03.2025, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109, 352, 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023.

3. As per allegation, on account of land dispute, altercation took place in which injury has been received by the victims.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the Petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that as a matter of fact, both the sides are agnates and the occurrence took place on account of land

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.76492 of 2025(4) dt.23-02-2026 2/3 dispute and both the sides got injury leading to case and counter case. The counter case lodged by the Petitioner's side is Narpatganj P.S. Case No.108 of 2025.

5. It is also stated in paragraph no. 2 of the bail petition that the petitioner has not moved this Court earlier either for anticipatory bail or regular one in the instant case.

6. It has further been stated in paragraph no.3 of the bail petition that the petitioner has been made accused in two other cases.

7. However, learned APP for the State vehemently opposes the prayer of the Petitioner for bail.

8. Considering the case and counter case and injury on both the sides, this petition is allowed, directing the petitioner, above-named, to be enlarged on bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt / production of a copy of this order, on his furnishing bail bonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000 /- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned concerned Court below, in connection with Narpatganj P.S. Case No.101 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the B.N.S.S 2023, and on the following conditions:

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.76492 of 2025(4) dt.23-02-2026 3/3 (i) In case, it is brought to the notice of the court below that the petitioner has any criminal antecedents, other than the disclosed one, learned court below shall cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner after hearing him and getting satisfied that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedents despite his knowledge of the same.

(ii) In case, it is brought to the notice of the court below that statement regarding previous bail petition is wrong, learned court below shall cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner. (Jitendra Kumar, J.) Chandan/- U T