Binay Sah v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.45208 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -14 Year- 2018 Thana -BAKHRI District- BEGUSARAI ======================================================

1. Binay Sah son of Laxmi Sah, resident of Village- Parihra, Police StationBakhri, District- Begusarai. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Nutan Mishra For the informant : Mr. Ravi Ranjan, Adv For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Amit Kumar Rakesh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 07-09-2018 Heard the parties.

The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Bakhri P.S. Case No.14 of 2018 registered for offences punishable under Sections 302/34, 120B of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

Allegation against the petitioner is firing on deceased causing death.

Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that nobody was eye witness of the occurrence and the witnesses during course of investigation has not supported the prosecution case and in such a situation identification of petitioner is itself doubtful.

Heard learned A.P.P. also as well as learned counsel for the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.45208 of 2018 (3) dt.07-09-2018 2/2 informant who have opposed the prayer for bail and stated that other witnesses have also supported the prosecution case. Having heard both sides, considering allegation of firing against petitioner, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the prayer for bail is dismissed. The learned trial Court is directed to expedite the trial.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) Sanjeev/- U T