← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./82561/2024bail granted

Pintu Chouhan v. The State Of Bihar

2025-01-16Mr. Justice R. P. Mishra3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.82561 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-505 Year-2024 Thana- CHANDI District- Nalanda ====================================================== Pintu Chouhan Son of Sri Bhagwan Chouhan Resident of Village - Sabalpur, P.S. - Chandi, District - Biharsharif (Nalanda) ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Kumar Manglam, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Pushpa Sinha, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 16-01-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Chandi P.S. Case No. 505 of 2024 instituted for the offences punishable under Sections 25(1-b)a, 26, 35 of the Arms Act and 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

3. The prosecution case, in short, is that one pistol, one country-made pistol, one rifle, 15 live cartridges and total 5 litres of country-made liquor have been recovered from the house of the petitioner.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. No incriminating article has been recovered from the conscious

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.82561 of 2024(3) dt.16-01-2025 2/3 possession of the petitioner rather the recovery has been made from the joint house of the petitioner where other family members of the petitioner also reside. The petitioner has got no concern with the alleged recovery of liquor and with the arms and ammunitions. The petitioner is in custody since 09.09.2024 and has one criminal antecedent. Charge-sheet has been submitted in this case. There is no compliance of Section 103 of the Bharatiya Nagarika Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.

5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

7. Let the petitioner be released on bail, after framing of charge, if not already framed, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Chandi P.S. Case No. 505 of 2024, subject to the following conditions:

(I) One of the bailors shall be own/close member of the family of the petitioner.

(II) The petitioner shall appear on each and every date

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.82561 of 2024(3) dt.16-01-2025 3/3 fixed at the trial. In case of default in such appearance on two consecutive dates, the Trial Court will have liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner.

(III) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Alok Verma/- U T