Akash Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.70319 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-625 Year-2019 Thana- BETTIAH CITY District- West Champaran ====================================================== Akash Kumar Son of Late Radhey Shyam Prasad Resident of Mohalla - Kotwali Chowk Shiwalaghat, P.S.- Bettiah Town, District- West Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Brij Kishor Mishra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tiwary, A.P.P.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 11-12-2019 Heard learned counsel for the parties.
Petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 414, 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
Allegation against the petitioner is recovery of one stolen motorcycle from his house. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the said motorcycle was purchased by petitioner from its rightful owner. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent and he is in custody since 21.08.2019. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned court below where the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.70319 of 2019(2) dt.11-12-2019 2/2 case is pending in connection with Bettiah Town P.S. Case No. 625 of 2019, with following conditions:- (1)Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.
(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the court below.
(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.
(S. Kumar, J) mdrashid/- U T