Patna High CourtCR. MISC./29091/2018bail granted

Ganesh Sao v. The State Of Bihar

2018-07-24Justice Smt. Anjana Mishra2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.29091 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-204 Year-2016 Thana- ARWAL District- Jehanabad ====================================================== Ganesh Sao, Son of Late Chutur Sao @ Chutu Sao, Resident of VillageImamganj, P.S. Khiri More, District- Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ajay Kumar Sinha, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ajay Kumar Jha, APP 243 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 24-07-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is languishing in jail since 12.03.2018 in connection with Arwal P.S. Case No. 204 of 2016 registered under Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code.

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that an altogether false and fabricated allegation has been made against the petitioner on the basis of some secret information received from the spy and on the basis of such information the Police Inspector has registered the case and the petitioner is languishing in jail.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances let the petitioner, named above, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Arwal P.S. Case No.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.29091 of 2018(5) dt.24-07-2018 2/2 204 of 2016 to the satisfaction of Sri Dhananjay Kumar, Chief Judicial Magistrate, Arwal,on the following conditions.

(1) One of the bailors will be the mother of the petitioner.

(2) The petitioner shall not indulge himself in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

(3) The petitioner shall remain physically present in Court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reasons, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.

(4) The petitioner shall co-operate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail. (Anjana Mishra, J) Shamshad/- U T