Ranjan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.74378 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-155 Year-2019 Thana- HAZIPUR INDUSTRIAL DistrictVaishali ====================================================== Ranjan Kumar Son of Yogendra Paswan Resident of Village - Bari Yusuphpur, P.S.- Industrial Distt - Vaishali.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Nityanand, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Pancha Nand Pandit, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 31-01-2020 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in Industrial Area P.S. Case No. 155 of 2019, registered for the offence punishable under Sections 457, 380 and 411 of the Indian Penal Code. Prosecution case in short is that on 09.09.2019 at 3.00 am. 02-03 persons entered into the house of informant and tried to commit theft. On alarm, informant's wife and nearby people assembled there. On seeing the people, all the accused persons started fleeing, this petitioner was caught with the help of people on the spot.

It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioner that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Nothing has been recovered from possession of this petitioner. Petitioner is in custody since 09.09.2019 having clean

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.74378 of 2019(2) dt.31-01-2020 2/2 antecedent.

Considering the facts aforesaid, the petitioners abovenamed, are directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000 (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vaishali at Hajipur in connection with Industrial Area P.S. Case No. 155 of 2019, subject to the following conditions:- (i) The petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reasons, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the court below.

(ii) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) vinita/- U T