Taukir Hussain @ Toukir Alam v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.83165 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-518 Year-2024 Thana- SIWAN MUFFASIL District- Siwan ====================================================== Taukir Hussain @ Toukir Alam Son of Md. Rafique Resident Of VillageMakriyar, P.S.- Siwan Muffasil, (Dhanauti O.P.), Dist.- Siwan. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Ajay Kumar Tiwary For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Madan Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. SONI SHRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 09-07-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 125(a), 125(b), 109, 3(5) of the B.N.S.
3. The allegation in the first information report is that all the accused persons including the present petitioner were uprooting the bricks from the wall of the old house of the informant and upon protest made by later, all the accused persons assaulted him with iron rod and sticks and there is specific allegation on this petitioner that he assaulted the brother of the informant Sheikh Abdullah.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that a dispute had arisen between the parties on account of land dispute and the same would also be evident from a bare reading
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.83165 of 2024(5) dt.09-07-2025 2/2 of the first information report. Allegation against the petitioner is confined to assaulting the brother of the informant Sheikh Abdullah and the injury report of Sheikh Abdullah would show that he received two injuries which are both simple in nature caused by hard and blunt object. There are allegations on others of having assaulted other persons but all the injuries sustained by the persons concerned are simple in nature.
5. Learned APP for the State has opposed the application for anticipatory bail.
6. Considering all the above mentioned facts and circumstances, let the above named petitioner in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of four weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Siwan Muffasil (Dhanauti O.P.) P.S. Case No. 518 of 2024, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C./482(2) of the B.N.S.S. (Soni Shrivastava, J) devendra/- U T