Guddu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.76123 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-911 Year-2019 Thana- NAWADA District- Nawada ====================================================== GUDDU KUMAR, aged about 28 years, (Male), Son of Late Suresh Prasad Laheri @ Late Sukesh Laheri, Resident of Village - Barodih, P.S.- Satgawan, District - Koderma, (Jharkhand) ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sheo Kumar Prasad, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Madhura Nand Jha (APP) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 03-12-2019 Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

Petitioner, who is in custody, seeks bail registered for the offences punishable under Section 30 (a) of the Excise Act.

Allegation is recovery of 312 liters illicit liquor from the car which was registered in the name of petitioner. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. Petitioner was not apprehended on the spot and car was being driven by the driver Guddu Kumar and the illicit liquor was kept in the car without any knowledge and information to the petitioner. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.76123 of 2019(2) dt.03-12-2019 2/2 Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional District and Sessions Judge-II-cum-Special Judge, Nawada, in connection with Nawada (Kadirgang) P.S. Case No. 911 of 2019, subject to conditions:

(1) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be represented on each and every date fixed by the court.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(4) If the petitioner is found involved in similar nature of offences, after his release on bail the trial court shall take steps to cancel his bail bonds.

(S. Kumar, J) Rajiv/- U T